diff --git a/literature/notes b/literature/notes
index dba9c8a2fe329195e33cddf4531bd2eeab432dc1..bcb65e0a8432f6a31c0e0ba328aa176948ebd1a7 100644
--- a/literature/notes
+++ b/literature/notes
@@ -1035,3 +1035,90 @@ main difference is where it runs and who runs it."
 problem with BAG: not enough people participate
 "the management of bots was a largely ignored and thankless job."
 a (probably) wrong perception by the community how the BAG worked, so it was criticised and challenged for being a cabal
+
+====================================================================
+\cite{Lessig2006}
+
+"A locked door is not a command “do not enter”
+backed up with the threat of punishment by the state. A locked door is a
+physical constraint on the liberty of someone to enter some space.
+My claim is that this form of regulation will become increasingly com-
+mon in cyberspace."(p.82)
+
+"Code is a regulator in cyberspace because it defines the terms upon which cyberspace is offered." (p.84)
+
+"Communities,
+exchange, and conversation all flourish in a certain type of space; they are
+extinguished in a different type of space." (p.85)
+"Spaces have values. 6 They manifest these values through the practices or lives
+that they enable or disable."(p.85)
+
+narrow bandwidth and text-centered communication
+"Most think of this fact about the early Net as a limitation. Technically, it
+was. But this technical description does not exhaust its normative description
+as an architecture that made possible a certain kind of life. From this perspec-
+tive, limitations can be features; they can enable as well as disable. And this
+particular limitation enabled classes of people who were disabled in real-
+space life." (p.86)
+
+"Every time AOL decides that it
+wants to regulate a certain kind of behavior, it must select from among at least
+four modalities—rules, norms, prices, or architecture." (p.94)
+
+"Norms become different when ballots can overrule them," (p.102)
+
+// TODO vgl Wikipedia!
+"politics [is] implemented through technology.” 41 Differ-
+ences in the code constitute them differently, but some code makes community
+thicker than others. Where community is thick, norms can regulate."(p.102)
+
+"End-to-end is a para-
+digm for technology that embeds values. Which architecture we encourage is
+a choice about which policy we encourage." (p.112)
+// TODO: What values are embedded in Wikipedia's architecture? In the architecture of the edit filter system?
+
+"In places where community is not fully self-enforcing, norms are supple-
+mented by rules imposed either through code or by the relevant sovereign." (p.113)
+
+"They have the right to
+exit, but in the sense that Soviet citizens had the right to exit—namely, with
+none of the assets they had built in their particular world." (p.113)
+
+quoting Second Life CEO's
+"[O]ur feeling is . . . that we should aggressively move into code anything we can,
+because of the enhanced scalability it gives us. And we should execute policy out-
+side of code only when absolutely necessary or unfeasible." (p.114)
+"If Second Life can use code to better control behavior, what about first-life?" (p.114)
+
+"Individuals can act
+to resist the force of code directly. Or individuals can act to resist the force of
+code through code." (p.118)
+
+quoting Tim Wu
+"The reason that code matters for law at all is its capability to define behavior on
+a mass scale." (p.119)
+"In this second sense, code functions “as an anti-regulatory mechanism: a
+tool to minimize the costs of law that certain groups will use to their advan-
+tage.” " (p.119)
+
+Chapter 7: things are regulated by; laws, norms, market, technology
+
+"Norms constrain through the
+stigma that a community imposes; markets constrain through the price that
+they exact; architectures constrain through the physical burdens they impose;
+and law constrains through the punishment it threatens." (p.124)
+
+Indirection and accountability
+"Indirection misdirects responsibility. When a government uses other
+structures of constraint to effect a constraint it could impose directly, it mud-
+dies the responsibility for that constraint and so undermines political
+accountability." (p.133)
+
+Chapter 8
+
+"The key criticism that I’ve identified so far is transparency. Code-based
+regulation—especially of people who are not themselves technically
+expert—risks making regulation invisible." (p.138)
+
+"Open code means open control—there is control, but the user is
+aware of it."(p.151)
diff --git a/notes b/notes
index 8e459aa9ee3cd888c85973c1d9ea80559fd6d4c4..f7ad1d40e3c69cbc476502d425d1cce0b84a11e6 100644
--- a/notes
+++ b/notes
@@ -1068,92 +1068,6 @@ To generate stats for different wiki projects
 =====================================================================
 Claudia: * A focus on the Good faith policies/guidelines is a historical development. After the huge surge in edits Wikipedia experienced starting 2005 the community needed a means to handle these (and the proportional amount of vandalism). They opted for automatisation. Automated system branded a lot of good faith edits as vandalism, which drove new comers away. A policy focus on good faith is part of the intentions to fix this.
 
-====================================================================
-\cite{Lessig2006}
-
-"A locked door is not a command “do not enter”
-backed up with the threat of punishment by the state. A locked door is a
-physical constraint on the liberty of someone to enter some space.
-My claim is that this form of regulation will become increasingly com-
-mon in cyberspace."(p.82)
-
-"Code is a regulator in cyberspace because it defines the terms upon which cyberspace is offered." (p.84)
-
-"Communities,
-exchange, and conversation all flourish in a certain type of space; they are
-extinguished in a different type of space." (p.85)
-"Spaces have values. 6 They manifest these values through the practices or lives
-that they enable or disable."(p.85)
-
-narrow bandwidth and text-centered communication
-"Most think of this fact about the early Net as a limitation. Technically, it
-was. But this technical description does not exhaust its normative description
-as an architecture that made possible a certain kind of life. From this perspec-
-tive, limitations can be features; they can enable as well as disable. And this
-particular limitation enabled classes of people who were disabled in real-
-space life." (p.86)
-
-"Every time AOL decides that it
-wants to regulate a certain kind of behavior, it must select from among at least
-four modalities—rules, norms, prices, or architecture." (p.94)
-
-"Norms become different when ballots can overrule them," (p.102)
-
-// TODO vgl Wikipedia!
-"politics [is] implemented through technology.” 41 Differ-
-ences in the code constitute them differently, but some code makes community
-thicker than others. Where community is thick, norms can regulate."(p.102)
-
-"End-to-end is a para-
-digm for technology that embeds values. Which architecture we encourage is
-a choice about which policy we encourage." (p.112)
-// TODO: What values are embedded in Wikipedia's architecture? In the architecture of the edit filter system?
-
-"In places where community is not fully self-enforcing, norms are supple-
-mented by rules imposed either through code or by the relevant sovereign." (p.113)
-
-"They have the right to
-exit, but in the sense that Soviet citizens had the right to exit—namely, with
-none of the assets they had built in their particular world." (p.113)
-
-quoting Seconf Life CEO's
-"[O]ur feeling is . . . that we should aggressively move into code anything we can,
-because of the enhanced scalability it gives us. And we should execute policy out-
-side of code only when absolutely necessary or unfeasible." (p.114)
-"If Second Life can use code to better control behavior, what about first-life?" (p.114)
-
-"Individuals can act
-to resist the force of code directly. Or individuals can act to resist the force of
-code through code." (p.118)
-
-quoting Tim Wu
-"The reason that code matters for law at all is its capability to define behavior on
-a mass scale." (p.119)
-"In this second sense, code functions “as an anti-regulatory mechanism: a
-tool to minimize the costs of law that certain groups will use to their advan-
-tage.” " (p.119)
-
-Chapter 7: things are regulated by; laws, norms, market, technology
-
-"Norms constrain through the
-stigma that a community imposes; markets constrain through the price that
-they exact; architectures constrain through the physical burdens they impose;
-and law constrains through the punishment it threatens." (p.124)
-
-Indirection and accountability
-"Indirection misdirects responsibility. When a government uses other
-structures of constraint to effect a constraint it could impose directly, it mud-
-dies the responsibility for that constraint and so undermines political
-accountability." (p.133)
-
-Chapter 8
-
-"The key criticism that I’ve identified so far is transparency. Code-based
-regulation—especially of people who are not themselves technically
-expert—risks making regulation invisible." (p.138)
-
-"Open code means open control—there is control, but the user is
-aware of it."(p.151)
 =====================================================================
 
 Toolforge links: