diff --git a/literature/notes b/literature/notes
index bcb65e0a8432f6a31c0e0ba328aa176948ebd1a7..c85271cf996331f0e224563abc7ed398d6c408bd 100644
--- a/literature/notes
+++ b/literature/notes
@@ -1122,3 +1122,20 @@ expert—risks making regulation invisible." (p.138)
 
 "Open code means open control—there is control, but the user is
 aware of it."(p.151)
+
+Chapter 9
+
+"It is reading the amendment differ-
+ently to accommodate the changes in protection that have resulted from
+changes in technology. It is translation to preserve meaning." (p.163)
+
+"When we know what values we
+want to preserve, we need only be creative about how to preserve them." (p.165)
+
+"My fear about cyberspace is that we will respond in the first way—that the
+courts, the institutions most responsible for articulating constitutional values,
+will stand back while issues of constitutional import are legislatively deter-
+mined. My sense is that they will step back because they feel (as the balance of
+this book argues) that these are new questions that cyberspace has raised.
+Their newness will make them feel political, and when a question feels polit-
+ical, courts step away from resolving it." (p.167)