diff --git a/thesis/5-Overview-EN-Wiki.tex b/thesis/5-Overview-EN-Wiki.tex
index d792e68f74c78d51abd3b75e4644551926e05da6..8a2049910ede0a890043aea7049a5873689c05cd 100644
--- a/thesis/5-Overview-EN-Wiki.tex
+++ b/thesis/5-Overview-EN-Wiki.tex
@@ -493,6 +493,10 @@ Filters targeting such behaviours (syn) were identified and grouped in the ``dis
 - Deletion nominations: "Good-faith nominations of articles (or templates, non-article pages, etc) are not vandalism."
 \end{comment}
 
+\subsection{Spam}
+
+\subsection{Point of view problems}
+
 
 \subsection{Good Faith}
 
@@ -545,6 +549,7 @@ Or there were such which simply tracked particular behaviours (such as mobile ed
 
 The maintenance cluster differs conceptually from the ``vandalism'' and ``good faith'' ones in so far that filters in it don't target particular **intents** of the editors whose edits are triggering the filter, but rather "side"-occurances that mostly went wrong.
 
+\subsection{Unknown}
 
 \subsection{Manual classification: outlook/concluding remarks}
 %TODO What were the first filters to be implemented immediately after the launch of the extension?