diff --git a/article/proceedings.tex b/article/proceedings.tex
index 366c75782ff3e914becee49fb0112eb634dd1fbf..e74af439896da2790e4c49dff85b919461055af7 100644
--- a/article/proceedings.tex
+++ b/article/proceedings.tex
@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ What do we want to know?
   * Question: Is it worth it to use a filter which has many side effects?
   * What can we filter with a REGEX? And what not? Are regexes the suitable technology for the means the community is trying to achieve?
 
-* add also "af_enabled" column to filter list; could be that the high hit count was made by false positives, which will have led to disabling the filter (TODO: that's a very interesting question actually; how do we know the high number of hits were actually leggit problems the filter wanted to catch and no false positives?)
+* add also "af\_enabled" column to filter list; could be that the high hit count was made by false positives, which will have led to disabling the filter (TODO: that's a very interesting question actually; how do we know the high number of hits were actually leggit problems the filter wanted to catch and no false positives?)
 
 
 \section{Putting things in perspective}
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ Chapter 2:
 "we first aim to see this world as our research participants do–from the inside."(p.14)
 "You might learn that what outsiders assume abouth the world you study may be limited, imprecise, mistaen, or egregiously wrong."(p.14)
 
-"\texit{How} you collect data affects \texit{which} phenomena yo will see, \textit{how}, \textit{where}, and \textit{when} you will view them, and \textit{what} sense you will make of them." (p.15)
+"\textit{How} you collect data affects \textit{which} phenomena yo will see, \textit{how}, \textit{where}, and \textit{when} you will view them, and \textit{what} sense you will make of them." (p.15)
 
 "We are not scientific obeservers who can dismiss scrutiny of our values by claiming scientific neutrality and authority." (p.15)