From 20d52a2353e674b16e2a075a47351ce9c7969c74 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lyudmila Vaseva <vaseva@mi.fu-berlin.de>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 11:44:04 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Update collaboration with other tools
---
thesis/4-Edit-Filters.tex | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/thesis/4-Edit-Filters.tex b/thesis/4-Edit-Filters.tex
index 35d4f11..716fe8f 100644
--- a/thesis/4-Edit-Filters.tex
+++ b/thesis/4-Edit-Filters.tex
@@ -410,7 +410,12 @@ which used to report users from the abuse log to WP:AIV, but has been inactive s
%TODO are there further examples of such collaborations: consider scripting smth that parses the bots descriptions from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:All_Wikipedia_bots and looks for "abuse" and "filter"
Apparently, Twinkle at least has the possibility of using heuristics from the abuse filter log for its queues.
-%TODO check. how about other tools
+% is that so? the only place I can find abuse filters mentioned with Twinkle is in the source code: https://github.com/azatoth/twinkle/blob/master/morebits.js#L2636; and I'm not quite sure what this part of the code does.
+\begin{comment}
+%TODO check other tools
+
+So, Huggle let the user define their own queue, but only along predefined parameters. So it's not really possible right now to hook it up to the AbuseLog
+\end{comment}
\begin{comment}
Not sure where this fits in
--
GitLab