diff --git a/literature/literature.bib b/literature/literature.bib
index 0da31566cf8a11faffc1ae32e7095a2410da9c1c..e07e95cefd9e974b164ece66d1b2b908b240d8f2 100644
--- a/literature/literature.bib
+++ b/literature/literature.bib
@@ -25,6 +25,15 @@
volume = {20}
}
+@inproceedings{WestKanLee2010,
+ title = {Stiki: an anti-vandalism tool for wikipedia using spatio-temporal analysis of revision metadata},
+ author = {West, Andrew G and Kannan, Sampath and Lee, Insup},
+ booktitle = {Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration},
+ pages = {32},
+ year = {2010},
+ organization = {ACM}
+}
+
@inproceedings{WulThaDix2017,
title = {Ex machina: Personal attacks seen at scale},
author = {Wulczyn, Ellery and Thain, Nithum and Dixon, Lucas},
diff --git a/literature/notes b/literature/notes
index 9354bd68746ade2716c3395e9b2a27bb94cbf30f..4c876cd352921964a5aff37b9e61fc40d84eb110 100644
--- a/literature/notes
+++ b/literature/notes
@@ -544,3 +544,19 @@ playing game—with “monsters”
“overlords” (administrators) to submit
to (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Wikipedia:MMORPG)."
+
+==========================================
+\cite{WestKanLee2010}
+
+"STiki is an anti-vandalism tool for Wikipedia. Unlike similar tools, STiki does not rely on natural language
+processing (NLP) over the article or diff text to locate vandalism"
+
+"STiki leverages spatio-temporal properties of revision metadata."
+"The feasibility of utilizing such properties was demonstrated in our prior
+work, which found they perform comparably to NLP-efforts while being more efficient, robust to evasion, and
+language independent."
+
+"It consists of, (1) a server-side
+processing engine that examines revisions, scoring the likelihood each is vandalism, and, (2) a client-side GUI
+that presents likely vandalism to end-users for definitive classiffcation (and if necessary, reversion on
+Wikipedia"
diff --git a/memos/memo-good-faith b/memos/memo-good-faith
index 16a1b30053331b293a31d9f974ef696a47d09606..8809937ed866f24ea856ab09a3caccca35c73de8 100644
--- a/memos/memo-good-faith
+++ b/memos/memo-good-faith
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ Edit warring is not vandalism either~\cite{Wikipedia:Vandalism}.
Oftentimes, it isn't a trivial task to distinguish good faith from vandalism edits.
Based on content of the edit alone, it might be frankly impossible.
+This is also signaled for example on the STiki page ("Uncertainty over malice: It can be tricky to differentiate between vandalism and good-faith edits that are nonetheless unconstructive.")~\cite{Wikipedia:STiki}
Following the guideline, a patrolling editor (or whoever reads) should asume good faith first and seek a converstation with the disrupting editor. (TODO: where is this suggested?)
Only if the disrupting editor proves to be uncooperating, ignores warnings and continues disruptive behaviour, their edits are to be labelled "vandalism".
diff --git a/notes b/notes
index fb3bdded11fdef3a5031c65458e391774d3fd890..d4ba12f2b4d24a65ad112a546c307cb1e506fd60 100644
--- a/notes
+++ b/notes
@@ -1341,4 +1341,30 @@ Vandalism comes from:
Trolls, sock puppets, etc. - disgruntled "power users"
"
+=======================================================================================
+https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:STiki
+
+"STiki is a tool available to trusted users that is used to detect and revert vandalism, spam, and other types of unconstructive edits made at Wikipedia. "
+
+"STiki chooses edits to show to end users; if a displayed edit is judged to be vandalism, spam, etc., STiki streamlines the reversion and warning process. STiki facilitates collaboration in reverting vandalism; a centrally stored lists of edits to be inspected are served to STiki users to reduce redundant effort."
+
+"STiki may only be used by editors with a Wikipedia account. Additionally, the account must meet some qualifications to reduce the probability of users misidentifying vandalism."
+
+"The account must have any one of: (1) the rollback permission/right, (2) at least 1000 article edits (in the article namespace, not to talk/user pages), or (3) special permission via the talk page. We emphasize that users must take responsibility for their actions with STiki. "
+
+"After login, users primarily interact with the GUI tool by classifying edits into one of four categories:
+vandalism
+good faith revert
+pass
+innocent "
+//interestingly, at the initial tool presentation~\cite{WestKanLee2010}, there was no "good faith" option. It seemed to have been added quite promptly after though, since the screenshot of the tool on the page has the button already and claims to have been made on 28 February 2010
+
+"Uncertainty over malice: It can be tricky to differentiate between vandalism and good-faith edits that are nonetheless unconstructive. "
+
+============================================================================
+https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:STiki/leaderboard
+
+"Above all else, it should be emphasized that STiki is not a competition."
+//compare also~\cite{HalRied2012} who warn against Wikipedia becoming gamified with vandals being "monsters"
+" STiki users who operate the tool recklessly in the hope of inflating their statistics are not helping themselves or the project "
diff --git a/thesis/2-Background.tex b/thesis/2-Background.tex
index c508c04e2d8836f163424fef9de1f906a71eb917..f9919b04b8cb6885cd5335201976b3972e2eb147 100644
--- a/thesis/2-Background.tex
+++ b/thesis/2-Background.tex
@@ -74,7 +74,8 @@ socio-technical assemblages (see Geiger)
\subsection{Semi-automatic tools}
-Huggle, Twinkle, STiki
+Huggle, Twinkle, STiki~\cite{WestKanLee2010}
+\url{http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:STiki}
\url{https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser}
diff --git a/thesis/references.bib b/thesis/references.bib
index ae1f7a47a7046d7eb36fa7e589471ae5e17e6a15..8d76f8f71e0e522aa1a0eaca5d4c526d02044e86 100644
--- a/thesis/references.bib
+++ b/thesis/references.bib
@@ -141,6 +141,15 @@
\url{https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2009-03-23/Abuse_Filter}}
}
+@inproceedings{WestKanLee2010,
+ title = {Stiki: an anti-vandalism tool for wikipedia using spatio-temporal analysis of revision metadata},
+ author = {West, Andrew G and Kannan, Sampath and Lee, Insup},
+ booktitle = {Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration},
+ pages = {32},
+ year = {2010},
+ organization = {ACM}
+}
+
@misc{Wikipedia:EditFilter,
key = "Wikipedia Edit Filter",
author = {},
@@ -204,6 +213,15 @@
\url{https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Edit_filter/Requested}}
}
+@misc{Wikipedia:STiki,
+ key = "Wikipedia STiki Tool",
+ author = {},
+ title = {},
+ year = 2019,
+ note = {Retreived March 31, 2019 from
+ \url{https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:STiki}}
+}
+
@misc{Wikipedia:Vandalism,
key = "Wikipedia Vandalism",
author = {},
diff --git a/todo b/todo
index ea139d7349b4f91c1f8616965a4113037044cd90..5c334c4d6273cfa162be09c278cddd3ecfd624ff 100644
--- a/todo
+++ b/todo
@@ -57,7 +57,6 @@ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism_Unit/Vandalism_studies
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism_Unit/Vandalism_studies/Study2
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism_Unit/Vandalism_studies/Obama_article_study
-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:STiki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:TW
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution
@@ -184,6 +183,8 @@ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Harassment
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Assume_good_faith
+https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:STiki
+
## Software
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:AbuseFilter/Actions