From 22f6b07ca99a88141b3cb20a12891bf796c37b8b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lyudmila Vaseva <vaseva@mi.fu-berlin.de>
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2019 11:09:45 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Add notes on STiki

---
 literature/literature.bib |  9 +++++++++
 literature/notes          | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 memos/memo-good-faith     |  1 +
 notes                     | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 thesis/2-Background.tex   |  3 ++-
 thesis/references.bib     | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 todo                      |  3 ++-
 7 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/literature/literature.bib b/literature/literature.bib
index 0da3156..e07e95c 100644
--- a/literature/literature.bib
+++ b/literature/literature.bib
@@ -25,6 +25,15 @@
   volume = {20}
 }
 
+@inproceedings{WestKanLee2010,
+  title = {Stiki: an anti-vandalism tool for wikipedia using spatio-temporal analysis of revision metadata},
+  author = {West, Andrew G and Kannan, Sampath and Lee, Insup},
+  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration},
+  pages = {32},
+  year = {2010},
+  organization = {ACM}
+}
+
 @inproceedings{WulThaDix2017,
   title = {Ex machina: Personal attacks seen at scale},
   author = {Wulczyn, Ellery and Thain, Nithum and Dixon, Lucas},
diff --git a/literature/notes b/literature/notes
index 9354bd6..4c876cd 100644
--- a/literature/notes
+++ b/literature/notes
@@ -544,3 +544,19 @@ playing game—with “monsters”
 “overlords” (administrators) to submit
 to (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
 Wikipedia:MMORPG)."
+
+==========================================
+\cite{WestKanLee2010}
+
+"STiki is an anti-vandalism tool for Wikipedia. Unlike similar tools, STiki does not rely on natural language
+processing (NLP) over the article or diff text to locate vandalism"
+
+"STiki leverages spatio-temporal properties of revision metadata."
+"The feasibility of utilizing such properties was demonstrated in our prior
+work, which found they perform comparably to NLP-efforts while being more efficient, robust to evasion, and
+language independent."
+
+"It consists of, (1) a server-side
+processing engine that examines revisions, scoring the likelihood each is vandalism, and, (2) a client-side GUI
+that presents likely vandalism to end-users for definitive classiffcation (and if necessary, reversion on
+Wikipedia"
diff --git a/memos/memo-good-faith b/memos/memo-good-faith
index 16a1b30..8809937 100644
--- a/memos/memo-good-faith
+++ b/memos/memo-good-faith
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ Edit warring is not vandalism either~\cite{Wikipedia:Vandalism}.
 
 Oftentimes, it isn't a trivial task to distinguish good faith from vandalism edits.
 Based on content of the edit alone, it might be frankly impossible.
+This is also signaled for example on the STiki page ("Uncertainty over malice: It can be tricky to differentiate between vandalism and good-faith edits that are nonetheless unconstructive.")~\cite{Wikipedia:STiki}
 Following the guideline, a patrolling editor (or whoever reads) should asume good faith first and seek a converstation with the disrupting editor. (TODO: where is this suggested?)
 Only if the disrupting editor proves to be uncooperating, ignores warnings and continues disruptive behaviour, their edits are to be labelled "vandalism".
 
diff --git a/notes b/notes
index fb3bdde..d4ba12f 100644
--- a/notes
+++ b/notes
@@ -1341,4 +1341,30 @@ Vandalism comes from:
     Trolls, sock puppets, etc. - disgruntled "power users"
 "
 
+=======================================================================================
+https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:STiki
+
+"STiki is a tool available to trusted users that is used to detect and revert vandalism, spam, and other types of unconstructive edits made at Wikipedia. "
+
+"STiki chooses edits to show to end users; if a displayed edit is judged to be vandalism, spam, etc., STiki streamlines the reversion and warning process. STiki facilitates collaboration in reverting vandalism; a centrally stored lists of edits to be inspected are served to STiki users to reduce redundant effort."
+
+"STiki may only be used by editors with a Wikipedia account. Additionally, the account must meet some qualifications to reduce the probability of users misidentifying vandalism."
+
+"The account must have any one of: (1) the rollback permission/right, (2) at least 1000 article edits (in the article namespace, not to talk/user pages), or (3) special permission via the talk page. We emphasize that users must take responsibility for their actions with STiki. "
+
+"After login, users primarily interact with the GUI tool by classifying edits into one of four categories:
+vandalism
+good faith revert
+pass
+innocent "
+//interestingly, at the initial tool presentation~\cite{WestKanLee2010}, there was no "good faith" option. It seemed to have been added quite promptly after though, since the screenshot of the tool on the page has the button already and claims to have been made on 28 February 2010
+
+"Uncertainty over malice: It can be tricky to differentiate between vandalism and good-faith edits that are nonetheless unconstructive. "
+
+============================================================================
+https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:STiki/leaderboard
+
+"Above all else, it should be emphasized that STiki is not a competition."
+//compare also~\cite{HalRied2012} who warn against Wikipedia becoming gamified with vandals being "monsters"
 
+" STiki users who operate the tool recklessly in the hope of inflating their statistics are not helping themselves or the project "
diff --git a/thesis/2-Background.tex b/thesis/2-Background.tex
index c508c04..f9919b0 100644
--- a/thesis/2-Background.tex
+++ b/thesis/2-Background.tex
@@ -74,7 +74,8 @@ socio-technical assemblages (see Geiger)
 
 \subsection{Semi-automatic tools}
 
-Huggle, Twinkle, STiki
+Huggle, Twinkle, STiki~\cite{WestKanLee2010}
+\url{http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:STiki}
 
 \url{https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser}
 
diff --git a/thesis/references.bib b/thesis/references.bib
index ae1f7a4..8d76f8f 100644
--- a/thesis/references.bib
+++ b/thesis/references.bib
@@ -141,6 +141,15 @@
                   \url{https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2009-03-23/Abuse_Filter}}
 }
 
+@inproceedings{WestKanLee2010,
+  title = {Stiki: an anti-vandalism tool for wikipedia using spatio-temporal analysis of revision metadata},
+  author = {West, Andrew G and Kannan, Sampath and Lee, Insup},
+  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration},
+  pages = {32},
+  year = {2010},
+  organization = {ACM}
+}
+
 @misc{Wikipedia:EditFilter,
   key =          "Wikipedia Edit Filter",
   author =       {},
@@ -204,6 +213,15 @@
                   \url{https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Edit_filter/Requested}}
 }
 
+@misc{Wikipedia:STiki,
+  key =          "Wikipedia STiki Tool",
+  author =       {},
+  title =        {},
+  year =         2019,
+  note =         {Retreived March 31, 2019 from
+                  \url{https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:STiki}}
+}
+
 @misc{Wikipedia:Vandalism,
   key =          "Wikipedia Vandalism",
   author =       {},
diff --git a/todo b/todo
index ea139d7..5c334c4 100644
--- a/todo
+++ b/todo
@@ -57,7 +57,6 @@ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism_Unit/Vandalism_studies
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism_Unit/Vandalism_studies/Study2
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism_Unit/Vandalism_studies/Obama_article_study
 
-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:STiki
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:TW
 
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution
@@ -184,6 +183,8 @@ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Harassment
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Assume_good_faith
 
+https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:STiki
+
 ## Software
 
 https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:AbuseFilter/Actions
-- 
GitLab