diff --git a/meeting-notes/20190715.md b/meeting-notes/20190715.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9c19fe1ff9b5ef8fb550538849d138d161c433e9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meeting-notes/20190715.md
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+# Meeting 15.07.2019
+
+* Evaluation?
+* Abstract in DE and EN?
+* Discuss clusters (manual tagging)
+* Bots on Wikipedia: Unfolding their duties -> technical report?
+* methods chapter vs explaining methodology in chapters?
+* split chapter 5: manual classification in a separate chapter?
diff --git a/thesis/3-Methods.tex b/thesis/3-Methods.tex
index 3a153f38d5ea1da9b116931fe5ede8c0c492ca5e..9117eb5184e754378107505d52c899aa2a667b18 100644
--- a/thesis/3-Methods.tex
+++ b/thesis/3-Methods.tex
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ what is in someone' s mind-particularly if he or she does not tell you."(p.68)
 
 \end{comment}
 
-\section{Cooking Data With Care}
-or Critical data science? Or both?
+%\section{Cooking Data With Care}
+%or Critical data science? Or both?
 
 \section{Validation}
diff --git a/thesis/appendix.tex b/thesis/appendix.tex
index 8750178d3ba5bfabfd5ada8ae87f31ca0a4bf874..de382f7c31cfcb3effb054b730d8bc723937dd8b 100644
--- a/thesis/appendix.tex
+++ b/thesis/appendix.tex
@@ -12,11 +12,11 @@
 \section{Code book}
 \label{app:code_book}
 
-The purpose of this section is to provide a detailed overview of the labels\footnote{Here, I use the words "codes"/"tags"/"labels" interchangeably.} used for the manual tagging of edit filters.
+Here, a detailed overview of the labels\footnote{Here, I use the words "codes"/"tags"/"labels" interchangeably.} used for the manual tagging of edit filters is provided.
 
 \subsection{A few notes on the labels/labeling process}
 
-I started coding strongly influenced by the coding methodologies applied by Grounded Theory scholars~\cite[42-71]{Charmaz2006} and mostly let the labels emerge during the process. %TODO describe in greater detail? should appear in methodology anyway?
+I started coding strongly influenced by the coding methodologies applied by grounded theory scholars~\cite[42-71]{Charmaz2006} (described in more detail in chapter~\ref{chap:methods}) and mostly let the labels emerge during the process.
 In addition to that, for vandalism related labels, I used some of the vandalism types identified by the community in~\cite{Wikipedia:VandalismTypes}.
 However, I regarded the types more as an inspiration and haven't adopted the proposed typology 1:1 since I found some of the identified types quite general and more specific categories seemed to render more insights.
 For instance, I haven't adopted the 'addition of text' category since it seemed more insightful(syn!) to have more specific labels such as 'hoaxing' or 'silly\_vandalism', see below for definition.
diff --git a/thesis/conclusion.tex b/thesis/conclusion.tex
index b08e051b2f833b0f87ecba94750fdd9388517d40..9ccc3b0c84e72bf62f71360d8a24330bc30b94f5 100644
--- a/thesis/conclusion.tex
+++ b/thesis/conclusion.tex
@@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ In a way, not taking a side is positioning in itself.
 The present thesis just lay the ground work for future edit filters research.
 I gave an initial overview and summarised/showed/pointed out interesting paths/framework for future research (syn!).
 
+% TODO Refer back to title! Who is allowed to publish? Who decides?
+
 Special attention: following edit filters from DE Wikipedia:
 
 196 : "US-amerikanisch -> amerikanisch ([[WP:RS\#Korrektoren]])"