From 269dde2a866e1595fcd8d7abea739139862857ec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lyudmila Vaseva <vaseva@mi.fu-berlin.de>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 08:35:50 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Add a couple of notes
---
meeting-notes/20190715.md | 8 ++++++++
thesis/3-Methods.tex | 4 ++--
thesis/appendix.tex | 4 ++--
thesis/conclusion.tex | 2 ++
4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 meeting-notes/20190715.md
diff --git a/meeting-notes/20190715.md b/meeting-notes/20190715.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9c19fe1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meeting-notes/20190715.md
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+# Meeting 15.07.2019
+
+* Evaluation?
+* Abstract in DE and EN?
+* Discuss clusters (manual tagging)
+* Bots on Wikipedia: Unfolding their duties -> technical report?
+* methods chapter vs explaining methodology in chapters?
+* split chapter 5: manual classification in a separate chapter?
diff --git a/thesis/3-Methods.tex b/thesis/3-Methods.tex
index 3a153f3..9117eb5 100644
--- a/thesis/3-Methods.tex
+++ b/thesis/3-Methods.tex
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ what is in someone' s mind-particularly if he or she does not tell you."(p.68)
\end{comment}
-\section{Cooking Data With Care}
-or Critical data science? Or both?
+%\section{Cooking Data With Care}
+%or Critical data science? Or both?
\section{Validation}
diff --git a/thesis/appendix.tex b/thesis/appendix.tex
index 8750178..de382f7 100644
--- a/thesis/appendix.tex
+++ b/thesis/appendix.tex
@@ -12,11 +12,11 @@
\section{Code book}
\label{app:code_book}
-The purpose of this section is to provide a detailed overview of the labels\footnote{Here, I use the words "codes"/"tags"/"labels" interchangeably.} used for the manual tagging of edit filters.
+Here, a detailed overview of the labels\footnote{Here, I use the words "codes"/"tags"/"labels" interchangeably.} used for the manual tagging of edit filters is provided.
\subsection{A few notes on the labels/labeling process}
-I started coding strongly influenced by the coding methodologies applied by Grounded Theory scholars~\cite[42-71]{Charmaz2006} and mostly let the labels emerge during the process. %TODO describe in greater detail? should appear in methodology anyway?
+I started coding strongly influenced by the coding methodologies applied by grounded theory scholars~\cite[42-71]{Charmaz2006} (described in more detail in chapter~\ref{chap:methods}) and mostly let the labels emerge during the process.
In addition to that, for vandalism related labels, I used some of the vandalism types identified by the community in~\cite{Wikipedia:VandalismTypes}.
However, I regarded the types more as an inspiration and haven't adopted the proposed typology 1:1 since I found some of the identified types quite general and more specific categories seemed to render more insights.
For instance, I haven't adopted the 'addition of text' category since it seemed more insightful(syn!) to have more specific labels such as 'hoaxing' or 'silly\_vandalism', see below for definition.
diff --git a/thesis/conclusion.tex b/thesis/conclusion.tex
index b08e051..9ccc3b0 100644
--- a/thesis/conclusion.tex
+++ b/thesis/conclusion.tex
@@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ In a way, not taking a side is positioning in itself.
The present thesis just lay the ground work for future edit filters research.
I gave an initial overview and summarised/showed/pointed out interesting paths/framework for future research (syn!).
+% TODO Refer back to title! Who is allowed to publish? Who decides?
+
Special attention: following edit filters from DE Wikipedia:
196 : "US-amerikanisch -> amerikanisch ([[WP:RS\#Korrektoren]])"
--
GitLab