diff --git a/thesis/5-Overview-EN-Wiki.tex b/thesis/5-Overview-EN-Wiki.tex
index 9f797f1c4e333687e1a3707f610f236d2a45b5c1..684213334c342d78e90d0ad1500c0c2207e0b87b 100644
--- a/thesis/5-Overview-EN-Wiki.tex
+++ b/thesis/5-Overview-EN-Wiki.tex
@@ -397,24 +397,24 @@ There are also private filters targetting personal attack or abuse cases.
 Here, filters are private in order to protect the affected person(s)~\cite{Wikipedia:EditFilter}.
 A dedicated subcluster of ``hardcore vandalism'' was defined (syn!) for these cases.
 
-
+%TODO what to make out of this? It's kind of interesting but doesn't really serve any purpose..
+\begin{comment}
 motivations:
 - seeking attention
 - misusing the encyclopedia for own purposes (self-promotion, seo..)
 - spreading wrong information
 - defacing topics
+\end{comment}
 
-## DEF Vandalism, according to Wikipedia
-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Vandalism
-"On Wikipedia, vandalism has a very specific meaning: editing (or other behavior) deliberately intended to obstruct or defeat the project's purpose, which is to create a free encyclopedia, in a variety of languages, presenting the sum of all human knowledge."
-"The malicious removal of encyclopedic content, or the changing of such content beyond all recognition, without any regard to our core content policies of neutral point of view (which does not mean no point of view), verifiability and no original research, is a deliberate attempt to damage Wikipedia. There, of course, exist more juvenile forms of vandalism, such as adding irrelevant obscenities or crude humor to a page, illegitimately blanking pages, and inserting obvious nonsense into a page. Abusive creation or usage of user accounts and IP addresses may also constitute vandalism."
-
+\begin{comment}
+%TODO decide what to do with all of this. Probably just leave out
 ## Consequences of vandalism, vandalism management
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Vandalism
 "Vandalism is prohibited. While editors are encouraged to warn and educate vandals, warnings are by no means a prerequisite for blocking a vandal (although administrators usually only block when multiple warnings have been issued). "
 
 "Upon discovering vandalism, revert such edits, using the undo function or an anti-vandalism tool. Once the vandalism is undone, warn the vandalizing editor. Notify administrators at the vandalism noticeboard of editors who continue to vandalize after multiple warnings, and administrators should intervene to preserve content and prevent further disruption by blocking such editors. Users whose main or sole purpose is clearly vandalism may be blocked indefinitely without warning."
 
+% TODO maybe keep this part, not exactly clear where
 One of the strategies to spot vandalism is "Watching for edits tagged by the abuse filter. However, many tagged edits are legitimate, so they should not be blindly reverted. That is, do not revert without at least reading the edit." //mention of filters!
 
 "Warn the vandal. Access the vandal's talk page and warn them. A simple note explaining the problem with their editing is sufficient. If desired, a series of warning templates exist to simplify the process of warning users, but these templates are not required. These templates include
@@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ One of the strategies to spot vandalism is "Watching for edits tagged by the abu
     Level two: {{subst:uw-vandalism2}} This warning is also fairly mild, though it explicitly uses the word 'vandalism' and links to this Wikipedia policy.
     Level three: {{subst:uw-vandalism3}} This warning is sterner. It is the first to warn that further disruptive editing or vandalism may lead to a block.
     Level four: {{subst:uw-vandalism4}} This is the sharpest vandalism warning template, and indicates that any further disruptive editing may lead to a block without warning."
-
+\end{comment}
 
 \subsection{Disruptive Editing}