diff --git a/thesis/6-Discussion.tex b/thesis/6-Discussion.tex
index ce75f67ece42ee4e3ed53bbbca76ead8ddf97e80..96233dacb400d556fa66d19d55cf753b3b4b4770 100644
--- a/thesis/6-Discussion.tex
+++ b/thesis/6-Discussion.tex
@@ -50,3 +50,4 @@ Second, unfortunately, including an ethnographic analysis was not possible.
 This is partially due to the fact that we employ a computer science perspective on the question and partially due to limited time.
 Third, the manual filter classification was undertaken by one person only, so biases of this person have certainly shaped the labels.
 
+%TODO describe also negative results!
diff --git a/thesis/conclusion.tex b/thesis/conclusion.tex
index 6e73ba0018816e9bd4fe1c24eafc0330c1de9919..8b05f2799789e7fc27b23d2d329a0b005f1c7a13 100644
--- a/thesis/conclusion.tex
+++ b/thesis/conclusion.tex
@@ -35,6 +35,10 @@ timeline
 
 \url{https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directive_on_Copyright_in_the_Digital_Single_Market#Positions}
 
+Interesting fact: there are edit filters that try to precisely identify the upload of media violating copyrights
+
+%TODO refer to Lessig, Chapter 10 when making the upload filter commentary
+
 \section{Directions for further studies}
 <insert long list of interesting questions here>