diff --git a/memos/memo-good-faith b/memos/memo-good-faith
index 175d3e5d818484e5ebbf59247ccf186c197307ab..e423e5d6a569a6ba6768896cb54e1a3fbc9f558d 100644
--- a/memos/memo-good-faith
+++ b/memos/memo-good-faith
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ Some of the filters in the "good faith" category target (public comment of the f
 - test edits
 - misplaced "#redirect" in articles
 - moves to or from Module namespace
-- Adding emoji unicode characters
+- Adding emoji unicode characters // although, I recently checked this one, and in the majority of cases these are vandalism edits
 - Large creations by inexperienced users
 - creation of a new article without any categories
 - new user removing references
diff --git a/memos/memo-vandalism b/memos/memo-vandalism
index 57e4f3ad750f4891e60b31764ebff2869d935f0c..a2cb39a7b671eab9a2246a2c596f61ace4abe964 100644
--- a/memos/memo-vandalism
+++ b/memos/memo-vandalism
@@ -10,6 +10,9 @@ Although this clashes with the overall *transparency* of the project (is there a
 There are also private filters targetting personal attack or abuse cases.
 Here, filters are private in order to protect affected person(s).
 
+The current state is also an "improvement" compared to the initially proposed visibility level of edit filters.
+In the initial version of the EditFilters Page (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Edit_filter&oldid=221158142) Andrew Garrett (User:Werdna), the author of the AbuseFilter MediaWiki extention, was suggesting that all filters should be private and only a group of previously approved users should be able to view them.
+
 According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Vandalism following (mostly disruptive) behaviours are **not vandalism**:
 - boldly editing
 - copyright violation