From 8271b0a5fe4f6279dac82461c10a2dfee63a5e2d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lyudmila Vaseva <vaseva@mi.fu-berlin.de>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 15:25:43 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Write out limitations

---
 article/proceedings.tex | 10 ++++++++--
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/article/proceedings.tex b/article/proceedings.tex
index f4cc212..c7a771e 100644
--- a/article/proceedings.tex
+++ b/article/proceedings.tex
@@ -1245,8 +1245,14 @@ Inbetween
   - test filters
 
 \section{Limitations}
-* an ethnographic analysis as a part of the present work is not possible; (cs perspective, limited time)
-* Disclaimer on limitations: there was only one person who manually tagged the filters according to their purpose; this has following limitations: ...; (Claudia promises to tag a second time if we submit a paper to the CHI;)
+
+This work presents a first attempt at analysing Wikipedia's edit filter system.
+It has several limitations (we could think of).
+First, it focuses on English Wikipedia only.
+We are convinced that there are valuable lessons to be learnt (about the communities, usefulness of filters, ..) from comparing edit filter use across different language versions.
+Second, unfortunately, including an ethnographic analysis was not possible.
+This is partially due to the fact that we employ a computer science perspective on the question and partially due to limited time.
+Third, the manual filter classification was undertaken by one person only, so biases of this person have certainly shaped the labels.
 
 \section{Discussion}
 
-- 
GitLab