diff --git a/notes b/notes index 1293e60ac9283891d776980df4071eac59011f75..fb3bdded11fdef3a5031c65458e391774d3fd890 100644 --- a/notes +++ b/notes @@ -1278,3 +1278,67 @@ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Assume_good_faith Good faith and newcomers "It is important to be patient with newcomers, who will be unfamiliar with Wikipedia's culture and rules, but may nonetheless turn out to be valuable contributors. " "Many new users who lack an intuitive grasp of Wikipedia customs are gradually brought around, once the logic behind these customs becomes clearer to them. " + +====================================================================== +https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism_Unit/Vandalism_studies + +The Vandalism Studies project is a portion of the Counter-Vandalism Unit designated to conduct research related to unconstructive edits on Wikipedia. + +There are 3 Studies: +Study 3 (suggest ideas) Discussion ongoing..., but planned for November +Obama article study (talk page) ☒ Stale +Study 2 (talk page) ☒ Not done and not likely to be done +Study 1 (talk page) Done + +==================================================================== +https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Angela/Vandalism_study + +User:Angela conducted a vandalism study on her own user page. + +"Vandalism studies/Study1 found that almost all vandalism (97%) is made by unregistered users. Looking at vandalism on my own user page, I find a very different result. Almost half of the vandalism is made by registered users. " + +======================================================================= +https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Colonel_Chaos/study + +Another user conducted vandalism study. +This one vandalises featured articles (different types of vandalism) and looks at the times to revert. + +======================================================================== +https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2009-06-22/Vandalism + +And yet another user conducted study. +This one is "Loren Cobb (User:Aetheling) holds a Ph.D. in mathematical sociology and is a research professor in the Department of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences at the University of Colorado Denver." + +studies the survival function of vandalism + +The two primary results from this study are: (a) the median time to correction is down to four minutes, and (b) some subtle forms of vandalism still persist for months and even years. + +suggest using median rather than mean time to correction + +100 randomly selected articles +"All data collection occurred on 2009-06-11" + +" +Results + Of the 100 articles, fully 75 had never been vandalized. + Of the 25 articles that were vandalized at least once, the most recent such instance of vandalism was eventually corrected in 23 articles. + In five (20%) of the vandalized articles, the most recent instance of vandalism was corrected in less than one minute. A further four instances were corrected in less than two minutes. + The median time to correction was four minutes. + Two articles were found to have suffered vandalism that was never corrected. One of these was a subtle act of vandalism that was committed on 2007-02-23, and still not detected by the date of the study, 2009-06-11. +" + +======================================================================================= +https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Counter-Vandalism_Unit/Vandalism_studies/Archive_1 + +" +Sources of vandalism + +Vandalism comes from: + + Anonymous IP addresses + Newly registered users (typically vandal-only accounts) + Disruptive editors (limited but some constructive work) + Trolls, sock puppets, etc. - disgruntled "power users" +" + +