From abf7afe5a5a01adc15a76b96abb0637c130ae08f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lyudmila Vaseva <vaseva@mi.fu-berlin.de>
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2019 08:19:45 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Add a wrap up to chapter 4
---
thesis/4-Edit-Filters.tex | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/thesis/4-Edit-Filters.tex b/thesis/4-Edit-Filters.tex
index c0c3c9c..f9a57aa 100644
--- a/thesis/4-Edit-Filters.tex
+++ b/thesis/4-Edit-Filters.tex
@@ -402,6 +402,7 @@ Filters on the other hand, are arguably(syn) easier to use: here, ``only'' under
Critical voices express different concerns about the individual mechanisms:
%Different pitfalls and concerns are express
+%TODO finish
\begin{comment}
\hline
@@ -544,10 +545,10 @@ Apparently, Twinkle at least has the possibility of using heuristics from the ab
\subsection{Conclusions}
%Conclusion, resume, bottom line, lesson learnt
-In short, in this chapter we found/worked out following salient characteristics of edit filters: ....
-
-
-So, as shown in figure~\ref{fig:funnel-with-filters}, edit filters are crucial since they get active before any of the other mechanisms.
+In short, in this chapter we studied edit filters' documentation and community discussions and worked out the salient characteristics of this mechanism.
+We also compared the filters to other quality control technologies on Wikipedia such as bots, semi-automated anti-vandalism tools and the machine learning framework ORES.
+We studied(syn) the filters(syn) in the context and time of their introduction and concluded that the community (syn) introduced them as a means to fight obvious, particularly persistent (syn), and cumbersome to remove vandalism.
+Revising the quality control mechanisms collaboration(syn) diagram~\ref{fig:funnel-no-filters} we introduced in chapter~\ref{chap:background}, we can now properly place the filters on it: see figure~\ref{fig:funnel-with-filters}.
\begin{figure}
\centering
--
GitLab