diff --git a/thesis/5-Overview-EN-Wiki.tex b/thesis/5-Overview-EN-Wiki.tex
index ea25d1e94aece4db390bb998d795424d84d9315e..ceeca9ddf76d5abec8ab41f7fc4b875ea9de8f5f 100644
--- a/thesis/5-Overview-EN-Wiki.tex
+++ b/thesis/5-Overview-EN-Wiki.tex
@@ -118,7 +118,6 @@ Most public filters on the other hand still assume good faith from the editors a
   \caption{EN Wikipedia edit filters: Filters actions for enabled hidden filters}~\label{fig:active-hidden-actions}
 \end{figure}
 
-%TODO What were the first filters to be implemented immediately after the launch of the extension?
 
 \subsection{Filter makers}
 
@@ -369,6 +368,16 @@ In the subsections that follow we discuss the salient properties of each manuall
     \item percentage filters of different types over the years: according to actions (I need a complete abuse\_filter\_log table for this!); according to self-assigned tags %TODO plot!
 \end{comment}
 
+%TODO What were the first filters to be implemented immediately after the launch of the extension?
+The extension was launched on March 17th, 2009.
+Filter 1 is implemented in the late hours of that day.
+Filters with IDs 1-80 (IDs are auto-incremented) were implemented the first 5 days after the extension was turned on (17-22.03.2009).
+So, apparently the most urgent problems the initial edit filter managers perceived were:
+page move vandalism (what Filter 1 initially targeted; it was later converted to a general test filter);
+blanking articles (filter 3)
+personal attacks (filter 9,11) and obscenities (12)
+some concrete users/cases (hidden filters, e.g. 4,21) and sockpuppetry (16,17)
+
 Following filter categories have been identified (sometimes, a filter was labeled with more than one tag):
 %TODO make a diagramm with these
 - Vandalism