diff --git a/meeting-notes/20190620.md b/meeting-notes/20190620.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..44fd6be8d9e95884b8859fa82a481011ff30c45e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meeting-notes/20190620.md
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+# Meeting 20.06.2019
+
+## Questions
+
+* Ethics of compiling detailed lists of traces for single editors?
+* discuss manual tags
+
+## Manual tags
+
+* get rid of the question mark:
+  ** gather all filters with a question mark
+  ** get rid of their label completely
+  ** recode them
+  (this guarantees also that bias of seeing the previous label is avoided)
+* note in the methodology on inter- and intra-coder integrity
+  ** to properly code the data, we need >=2 coders, there was unfortunately nobody else
+  ** but I try to guarantee intracoder integrity via above point (compare also Mariam's methodology book)
+* specific vs general tags
+  ** gather all tags in a list and compile a Code Book out of them (-> put in Appendix)
+  ** for every tag: definition, example, what makes it different from other tags? (if no difference can be determined -> merge)
+  ** cross validation: go over data and recode with all available tags at the end
+  ** when a distinct tag list is compiled -> cluster the tags into topics
+
+
+## Ethical concerns
+
+* we are in a open data / open science context; working on an open project (Wikipedia)
+* concerns when thickening traces and compiling data on particular editors (compare also Trace Ethnography paper;)
+  ** don't publish editors names - they are published themselves in different logs and locations, but don't publich extra compiled lists of stuff that will facilitate their explotation