diff --git a/literature/literature.bib b/literature/literature.bib
index efb2079763c1316e3aa94cea70e45f0bba03c5f8..1aef96f9b68d88d1ba7c46baa5443a9c13a0ab1a 100644
--- a/literature/literature.bib
+++ b/literature/literature.bib
@@ -8,6 +8,14 @@
   year = {2011}
 }
 
+@article{Geiger2017,
+  author = {Geiger, R Stuart},
+  title = {Beyond opening up the black box: Investigating the role of algorithmic systems in Wikipedian organizational culture},
+  journal = {Big Data \& Society},
+  year = {2017},
+  volume = {4}
+}
+
 @inproceedings{GeiRib2010,
   title = {The work of sustaining order in wikipedia: the banning of a vandal},
   author = {Geiger, R Stuart and Ribes, David},
diff --git a/literature/notes b/literature/notes
index aabb1948f850d0b7cdd4378e99b220c10b8d25ad..eb3e19447505e35485eb0a039d012f81f6cef66d 100644
--- a/literature/notes
+++ b/literature/notes
@@ -472,7 +472,7 @@ administrative, and categorization tasks."
 \cite{HalRied2012}
 
 "The first tools to redefine the
-way Wik ipedia dea lt with va n-
+way Wikipedia dealt with van-
 dalism were AntiVandalBot and
 VandalProof."
 
@@ -764,3 +764,175 @@ the part of their users."
 through standardized scripts of action in which it always
 possible to act otherwise, but such deviations demand
 inventiveness and time."
+
+======================================================================
+\cite{Geiger2017}
+
+situated in critical algorithmic studies, critical data studies,
+discusses issues in fairness, accountability and transparency
+
+(algorithmic) governance
+gatekeeping
+
+"the organizational culture of Wikipedia is deeply intertwined with various data-driven algorithmic
+systems, which Wikipedians rely on to help manage and govern the ‘‘anyone can edit’’ encyclopedia at a massive
+scale."
+"These bots, scripts, tools, plugins, and dashboards make Wikipedia more efficient for those who know how
+to work with them, but like all organizational culture, newcomers must learn them if they want to fully participate."
+
+Beschreibt die Prozesse für 2 verschiedene, oft vorkommende Edit-Abläufe, mit den Bots und automatischen Tools, die diese unterstützen
+* editing (your own) page on Wikipedia: Conflict of interest requests --> newcommers werden hier abgeschreckt
+* Speedy Deletion
+
+"But I realized that the more interesting question is why I had so internalized this socio-techni-
+cal assemblage and the values it enacts." // People internalise the way a system works and stop questioning it!!
+
+"They are deeply imbued with particular values, prin-
+ciples, norms, and ideals, and learning them is not
+just about technical competency, but also socialization
+into a complex organizational culture"
+
+Some descriptive statistics:
+"In the English-language Wikipedia, 22 of the 25 most active editors (by
+number of edits) are bot accounts, and July 2017, they made about 20% of all edits to encyclopedia articles."
+--> vgl: https://quarry.wmflabs.org/query/20703
+
+What does it take to be a Wikipedian:
+"when that partici-
+pation requires not only learning Wikipedia-specific
+jargon, norms, style guides, and rules, but also learning
+how to interact with all the bots and power tools"
+
+"Wikipedia demonstrates how the issues in and around
+algorithmic systems are as much social as they are tech-
+nical, going far beyond the opacities that arise around
+proprietary source code. My argument extends Burrell’s
+(2016) discussion of three different forms of opacity in
+machine learning: intentional secrecy (proprietary
+source code), technical literacy (such as learning to
+read code), and opacities inherent in machine learning
+(such as issues of interpretability). To these forms, I add
+another: the opacities in learning a particular institu-
+tional or organizational culture that is supported by
+algorithmic systems."
+// source is open, but who can actually read it? and is willing to invest the time and energy in order to hold the system accountable?
+// vgl auch Gedanke von Claudia: "Wikipedia is spannend, weil wir daran das erforschen können, was wir an Facebook nicht können. Und weil die ein Abbild der Gesellschaft im Kleinen ist."
+// vgl auch Web Science def: observe micro behaviours in order to study macro phenomenons (governance, ..)
+
+Def "algorithmic": "as involving encoded proced-
+ures, which are typically—but not exclusively—compu-
+tationally implemented."
+
+"Like all algorithmic systems, the ones I studied in
+Wikipedia were designed, developed, and deployed by
+people." //all developers are human and all humans make mistakes^^
+
+"As Gillespie (2014) argues: ‘‘A socio-
+logical analysis must not conceive of algorithms as
+abstract, technical achievements, but must unpack the
+warm human and institutional choices that lie behind
+these cold mechanisms.’’"
+
+Seaver (2013: 9–10) Def Algorithmic System:
+"It is not the algorithm, narrowly defined, that has
+sociocultural effects, but algorithmic systems — intri-
+cate, dynamic arrangements of people and code. . .
+When we realize that we are not talking about algo-
+rithms in the technical sense, but rather algorithmic
+systems of which code strictu sensu is only a part,
+their defining features reverse: instead of formality,
+rigidity, and consistency, we find flux, revisability,
+and negotiation."
+"In this context, I ask: for whom are algorithmic systems
+(and the organizations that rely on them) formal, rigid,
+and consistent, and for whom are they in flux, revisable,
+and negotiable?" //Vorwissen, das die Menschen mitbringen, ist wichtig!
+
+2nd level digital divide:
+"who had
+the knowledge, skills, and sense of empowerment to use
+the Internet in ways that further engaged, empowered,
+and benefitted their lives." nach Hargittai 2002
+
+Everything's open:
+"We must look at more than the fact that partici-
+pation in Wikipedia is open to the public; that the infra-
+structure supporting it is open sourced; and that the
+community’s policies, procedures, and norms are docu-
+mented in thousands and thousands of pages of text."
+
+BUT
+"We must also look at what kind of skills, knowledge, and
+investment is required to fully and successfully partici-
+pate,"
+
+speaks of deletion of substandard encyclopedic articles: Where and how are the standards defined? Who defines them?
+
+"article about a
+website fails the A7 criteria in the CSD process,
+which demands that articles ‘‘credibly indicate the
+importance or significance of the subject.’’ (A majority
+of speedy deleted articles are tagged with templates
+containing A7 rationales (Geiger and Ford, 2011).)"
+// ich finde dieses Kriterium ist äußerst mit Vorsicht zu genießen, da die Tür weit aufgemacht wird für Sexismus, Rassismus und andere Arten von Diskriminierung von Inhalten, die der Mehrheit von white dudes nicht passen
+
+"Yet I had a
+second, subtler motivation, hoping that in properly
+demonstrating correct usage of such a template within
+the established workflow of this process, I would be
+made legible as a Wikipedian who knew the CSD pro-
+cess and should be given some more leeway—unlike
+most of the people who were creating articles that
+they were deleting." //making use of the brocode^^
+
+"Such systems do not eliminate the need for human
+labor, but instead transform the kind of work that
+takes place,"
+
+erwähnt auch Abschrecken von newcommers
+
+"As
+Seaver (2013) notes with his critiques of various ‘‘crit-
+ical algorithms studies’’ literature, it is easy to slip into
+a mode of analysis where social factors are contextua-
+lized, while infrastructure remain static and determin-
+ing. Such an approach ‘‘keeps algorithms themselves
+untouched, objective stones tossed about in a roily
+social stream’’ (10)."
+
+"the algorithmic
+systems themselves are constructed, negotiated, contex-
+tualized, and differently interpreted and enacted." // aber wer kann beim Aushandeln mitmachen?
+
+"Wikipedia’s computational infrastructure is
+also designed and governed in a relatively open
+manner by the project’s volunteer community of edi-
+tors (Forte and Bruckman , 2008; Gilbert and Zachry,
+2015; Kennedy, 2010), unlike most of the automated
+systems that are increasingly prevalent in digitally
+mediated environments." //jup. und selbst da blick man nicht durch
+
+Requirements/Expectations for bot developers:
+"bot developers are generally expected to be responsive
+to reasonable requests and concerns from the
+community."
+
+"Wikipedians discuss and debate
+about what kinds of bots should exist in the project,"
+
+"one of the
+paradoxes of openness is that it can take substantial
+time, energy, investment, and resources to fully take
+advantage of all the materials released"
+
+Veterans vs newcomers:
+"they make it far easier for veteran Wikipedians to
+engage in the kind of specific, complex, multifacted
+work involved in the governance of Wikipedia. This
+can make it far more difficult for newcomers to partici-
+pate—not necessarily because bots, algorithms, or
+assisted tools are inherently difficult to deal with, but
+rather because bots support more complex kinds of gov-
+ernance practices in Wikipedia, and complex govern-
+ance practices are difficult for newcomers."
+