From c6b363627c3ca16a75c1106829409aac6bd93b47 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lyudmila Vaseva <vaseva@mi.fu-berlin.de>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 15:06:12 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Move bot papers notes to literature notes
---
literature/notes | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
notes | 29 -----------------------------
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/literature/notes b/literature/notes
index 9ff0539..ef47773 100644
--- a/literature/notes
+++ b/literature/notes
@@ -1,3 +1,30 @@
+\cite{MuellerBirn2014}
+
+Interesting info, not sure what to do with it
+
+2010: 40% of newcommers' contributions rejected based on automatic tools <---
+counter productive in engaging new contributors
+
+=====================================================
+\cite{GeiHal2017}
+
+Claudia's paper:
+"“In both cases of algorithmic governance
+– software features and bots – making rules part of the infrastructure, to a certain extent, makes
+them harder to change and easier to enforce” (p. 87)"
+
+=====================================================
+\cite{MueDoHer2013}
+1st major difference EN/DE Wikipedia:
+- automated vandal fighting not permitted in DE Wikipedia (ist es immer noch
+ so?)
+"algorithmic tools are only intended to support editors in identify-
+ing possible malicious edits, but automated assessments are not
+accepted"
+"Fighting vandals is seen as a form of handling excep-
+tions and should therefore be based upon human evaluation."
+
+Hoe? DE Wikipedia has also edit filters which is an automatic assessment of what to disallow.
\cite{WulThaDix2017}
personal attacks
@@ -7,7 +34,7 @@ looked at comments on Wikipedia talk pages
100k human labeled comments
63k machine labeled (classifier)
generated data set:
-https://figshare.com/articles/Wikipedia_Detox_Data/4054689
+https://figshare.com/Grticles/Wikipedia_Detox_Data/4054689
analysed time period: 2004-2015
diff --git a/notes b/notes
index dde2f38..4eebc32 100644
--- a/notes
+++ b/notes
@@ -1242,32 +1242,3 @@ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Responding_to_threats_of_harm
emergency response page
-
-=====================================================
-\cite{MuellerBirn2014}
-
-Interesting info, not sure what to do with it
-
-2010: 40% of newcommers' contributions rejected based on automatic tools <---
-counter productive in engaging new contributors
-
-=====================================================
-\cite{GeiHal2017}
-
-Claudia's paper:
-"“In both cases of algorithmic governance
-– software features and bots – making rules part of the infrastructure, to a certain extent, makes
-them harder to change and easier to enforce” (p. 87)"
-
-=====================================================
-\cite{MueDoHer2013}
-1st major difference EN/DE Wikipedia:
-- automated vandal fighting not permitted in DE Wikipedia (ist es immer noch
- so?)
-"algorithmic tools are only intended to support editors in identify-
-ing possible malicious edits, but automated assessments are not
-accepted"
-"Fighting vandals is seen as a form of handling excep-
-tions and should therefore be based upon human evaluation."
-
-Hoe? DE Wikipedia has also edit filters which is an automatic assessment of what to disallow.
--
GitLab