From ca542313fd0efe3d539e73880223628d1507bc1f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lyudmila Vaseva <vaseva@mi.fu-berlin.de>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 10:06:09 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Add more questions for today's discussion

---
 meeting-notes/20190214.md | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/meeting-notes/20190214.md b/meeting-notes/20190214.md
index 1539bf8..ffc2af0 100644
--- a/meeting-notes/20190214.md
+++ b/meeting-notes/20190214.md
@@ -3,10 +3,16 @@
 ## Questions
 
 * Collect further data? IVs?
-* What is the research question?
+* What is the research question?/The "computer science perspective"?
+  * How can we design a "better"/more efficient/more user friendly system? A system that reflects particular values (vgl Lessig, Code 2.0, Chapter 3, p.34)?
+  * Do filters work the desired way/help for a smoother Wikipedia service or is it a lot of work to maintain them and the usefulness is questionable?
   * Precision/Recall: False Positives? were filters shut down, bc they matched more False positives than they had real value?
   * How has the notion of vandalism changed over time (not particularly computer sciency..)?
   * What are disallow/block filters doing? Is it too great an intervention that drives new editors away? (Can we answer that?)
+  * Is it worth it to use a filter which has many side effects?
+  * What are discussions on filter patterns? On filter repercussions?
+  * What can we filter with a REGEX? And what not? Are regexes the suitable technology for the means the community is trying to achieve?
+  * GT is good for tackling controversial questions: e.g. are filters with disallow action a too severe interference with the editing process that has way too much negative consequences? (e.g. driving away new comers?)
 
 ## TODO
 
-- 
GitLab