From d80d7609cc5a86ef0420616b23e19d0495453b8b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lyudmila Vaseva <vaseva@mi.fu-berlin.de>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 16:13:07 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Add some thoughts for discussion

---
 thesis/6-Discussion.tex | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/thesis/6-Discussion.tex b/thesis/6-Discussion.tex
index 63bb7f6..f252e54 100644
--- a/thesis/6-Discussion.tex
+++ b/thesis/6-Discussion.tex
@@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ Claudia: * A focus on the Good faith policies/guidelines is a historical develop
 --  we can't really? unless we study the edits themselves; I did this exemplarily for edits from the peak period in 2016; they were not false positives but a big spam wave.
 \end{comment}
 
+% Ethical discussion: open science vs thick descriptions which put individuals on the spot
 
 \section{Limitations}
 
@@ -191,3 +192,5 @@ also
 %\subsection{Harassment and bullying}
 
 %TODO Do edit filter managers specialize on particular types of filters (e.g. vandalism vs good faith?) -- abuse\_filter\_history table is needed for this
+
+* talk to edit filter managers (especially such who are simultaneously also bot operators)
-- 
GitLab