From e21e80a066a9fbdf734d2eb0bff6ae0154ae9da4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lyudmila Vaseva <vaseva@mi.fu-berlin.de>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 14:23:48 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Add todos and notes from today's meeting

---
 meeting-notes/20190214.md | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/meeting-notes/20190214.md b/meeting-notes/20190214.md
index ffc2af0..61fc84d 100644
--- a/meeting-notes/20190214.md
+++ b/meeting-notes/20190214.md
@@ -16,6 +16,16 @@
 
 ## TODO
 
+* We need a description of the technical workings of the edit filter system!
+* How can we improve it from a computer scientist's/engineer's perspective?
+* What task do the edit filters try to solve? Why does this task exist?/Why is it important?
+* Why are there mechanisms triggered befor an edit gets published (such as edit filters), and such triggered afterwards (such as bots)? Is there a qualitative difference?
+* I want to help people to do their work better using a technical system (e.g. the edit filters). How can I do this?
+* The edit filter system can be embedded in the vandalism prevention frame. Are there other contexts/frames for which it is relevant?
+* really get hold of the abuse_filter_log table! Ask Hong/Marisa.
 
 ## Fun Facts
 
+* A focus on the Good faith policies/guidelines is a historical development. After the huge surge in edits Wikipedia experienced starting 2005 the community needed a means to handle these (and the proportional amount of vandalism). They opted for automatisation. Automated system branded a lot of good faith edits as vandalism, which drove new comers away. A policy focus on good faith is part of the intentions to fix this.
+
+
-- 
GitLab