From eea61d67a0b9ae72988f2861bcaaf4f4b7dc1c2b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lyudmila Vaseva <vaseva@mi.fu-berlin.de>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 07:48:54 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Clarify open questions
---
EN-state-of-the-art | 10 ++++++++++
meeting-notes/20181206.md | 5 +++++
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/EN-state-of-the-art b/EN-state-of-the-art
index 17257ef..4916cda 100644
--- a/EN-state-of-the-art
+++ b/EN-state-of-the-art
@@ -411,6 +411,16 @@ what do the most active filters do?
712 "possibly changing date of birth in infobox" ("possibly"? and I thought infoboxes were pre-generated from wikidata?); no actions
833 "newer user possibly adding a unreferenced or improperly referenced material"; no actions
+* get a sense of what gets filtered (more qualitative)
+ vandalism
+ unintentional suboptimal behavior from new users who don't know better (blanking an article/section; creating an article without categories; adding larger texts without references)
+
+* why get certain filters
+(and not others?)
+
+* has the willingness of the community to use filters increased over time?
+looking at aggregated values of number of triggered filters per year, the answer is rather it's quite constant
+
* how often were (which) filters triggered
https://tools.wmflabs.org/ptwikis/Filters:enwiki
--> stats for the last 30 days: filters sorted alphabetically, stats according to number of actions of each type (no action match, warn, tag, disallow, block)
diff --git a/meeting-notes/20181206.md b/meeting-notes/20181206.md
index 7896dd2..3afb51f 100644
--- a/meeting-notes/20181206.md
+++ b/meeting-notes/20181206.md
@@ -3,9 +3,14 @@
## New Questions
* to answer stats questions: study wikimedia api: toolserver?
+ this seems to do the trick: https://quarry.wmflabs.org/query/32537
* current graphs: where does the data come from, how were the graphs programmed?
+ still don't get it, poorly organised code in Portuguese, but see above for where the data can possibly come from
* how get the edit triggers counted?
+ they get logged in the abuse_filter_log table
* what gets filtered?
+ vandalism
+ unintentional suboptimal behavior from new users who don't know better (blanking an article/section; creating an article without categories; adding larger texts without references)
* has the willingness of the community to use filters increased over time?
* why get certain filters
* how do we classify them?
--
GitLab