diff --git a/thesis/2-Background.tex b/thesis/2-Background.tex
index 290fdf324b85de7c69244ab18fda7e2178d87a17..848b1568345a7444098309c705cc9d9146d73929 100644
--- a/thesis/2-Background.tex
+++ b/thesis/2-Background.tex
@@ -122,6 +122,16 @@ This is for one a harmful way to view the project, neglecting the ``assume good
 and also leads to such users seeking out easy to judge instancies from the queues in order to move onto the next entry more swiftly and gather more points
 leaving more subtle cases which really require human judgement to others.
 
+%TODO review this concern as well!
+\begin{comment}
+\cite{HalGeiTer2014}
+"Tools like Huggle raise practical design challenges and eth-
+ical issues for HCI researchers. In previous work, we have
+critiqued the “professional vision”[17] they enact and the as-
+sumptions and values they embody: most tools situate users
+as police, not mentors, affording rejection and punishment."
+\end{comment}
+
 \begin{comment}
 %Huggle
 Huggle was initially released in 2008.
diff --git a/thesis/introduction.tex b/thesis/introduction.tex
index 90408c346f6169c0d33cffd89cd30b033210a9e9..75c8624c1d3da60e492ce0a8b9fd3d3b2237f737 100644
--- a/thesis/introduction.tex
+++ b/thesis/introduction.tex
@@ -46,6 +46,19 @@ If the genesis doesn't make sense here, move it to Edit filters
 Nice quote:
 The Wikipedia Revolution: How A Bunch of Nobodies Created The World's Greatest Encyclopedia is a 2009 popular history book by new media researcher and writer Andrew Lih.
 
+\cite{HalGeiMorRied2013}
+"formalization of implicit norms into rules, and the embedding of these rules in technologies
+such as bots and templates," //code is law
+
+"decline-era newcomers may face entrenched social practices and
+technologically-embedded processes that are no longer open to re-negotiation"
+"policy calcification and increasing centralization of policy"
+
+"Wikipedia has changed from “the encyclopedia that anyone can edit” to “the encyclopedia that
+anyone who understands the norms, socializes him or herself, dodges the impersonal wall of
+semi-automated rejection and still wants to voluntarily contribute his or her time and energy can
+edit”"
+
 \cite{Tkacz2014}
 "As historical artifacts, encyclopedias have regularly offered great insight into the periods in which they were written. They tell us about what constitutes knowledge at a particular time as well as how the various bodies of knowledge were thought to relate to one another." (p.4)