diff --git a/src/one-body-sample.parset b/src/one-body-sample.parset
index d0771b85ce2363d30060533f38a0b983377db44c..1f8449c4ab9585dcd77bc03f138c28e347a484b8 100644
--- a/src/one-body-sample.parset
+++ b/src/one-body-sample.parset
@@ -38,21 +38,12 @@ nu1 = 1
 mu = 1
 nu2 = 1
 
-## TODO: what exactly reproduces a plain gauss-seidel step?
 [solver.tnnmg.main]
-# The canonical choice is 3-1-3. Since the nonlinear step is by far
-# the costliest, this is a lot more costly than 1-1-1. The number of
-# additional iterations is negligible.
-# A vvv- or vvvv-cycle appears to be even faster.
-# And leaving off the postsmoothing is even better yet
 nu1 = 1
 mu = 1 # Krause modification; old: 4
 nu2 = 0 # Krause modification; old: 1
 
 [localsolver]
-# Observation: Increasing this value yields noticeable additional
-# computational effort. The difference in the correction is
-# negligible.
 steps = 1
 
 [bisection]