From e020f9ad036755495f6c8ac55433b5955e2aac59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Elias Pipping <elias.pipping@fu-berlin.de>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 17:46:09 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Cleanup

---
 src/one-body-sample.parset | 9 ---------
 1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/one-body-sample.parset b/src/one-body-sample.parset
index d0771b85..1f8449c4 100644
--- a/src/one-body-sample.parset
+++ b/src/one-body-sample.parset
@@ -38,21 +38,12 @@ nu1 = 1
 mu = 1
 nu2 = 1
 
-## TODO: what exactly reproduces a plain gauss-seidel step?
 [solver.tnnmg.main]
-# The canonical choice is 3-1-3. Since the nonlinear step is by far
-# the costliest, this is a lot more costly than 1-1-1. The number of
-# additional iterations is negligible.
-# A vvv- or vvvv-cycle appears to be even faster.
-# And leaving off the postsmoothing is even better yet
 nu1 = 1
 mu = 1 # Krause modification; old: 4
 nu2 = 0 # Krause modification; old: 1
 
 [localsolver]
-# Observation: Increasing this value yields noticeable additional
-# computational effort. The difference in the correction is
-# negligible.
 steps = 1
 
 [bisection]
-- 
GitLab