Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 12e98d5a authored by Lyudmila Vaseva's avatar Lyudmila Vaseva
Browse files

Start bot subchapter

parent 1552397e
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -208,25 +208,33 @@ and VandalProof which
\subsection{Bots}
\cite{Livingstone2016}
Bot Def
"bots are processes that run in the background, are normally
invisible, react to their environment, and most importantly, run autonomously. Leonard (1997) claims autonomy
is the “crucial variable”"
Bots are undoubtedly the vandal fighting mechanism studied most in depth by the scientific community.
Following papers study(syn!) bots on Wikipedia (vandal fighting frame):
~\cite{GeiRib2010},
...
"What is a bot?
In the Wikimedia software, there are tasks that do all sorts of things, like count pages, count orphan pages, etc.
If these things are not in the software, an external bot could do them. It is just a small step to editing pages. The
main difference is where it runs and who runs it."
\cite{GeiRib2010}
BotDef
"Bots – short for „robots" – are fully-automated software
Geiger and Ribes~\cite{GeiRib2010} define bots as
``fully-automated software
agents that perform algorithmically-defined tasks involved
with editing, maintenance, and administration in Wikipedia."
with editing, maintenance, and administration in Wikipedia.''
---
%todo summarise aspects of bot papers:
trace enthnography and banning of vandals~\cite{GeiRib2010}
indepth analysis of ClueBot NG, and its place within vandal fighting infrastructure~\cite{GeiHal2013}
... (smth else??)
Further bots discussed by the literature include (ClueBot NG~\cite{GeiHal2013},~\cite{HalRied2012},)
XLinkBot~\cite{HalRied2012},
HBC AIV Helperbots~\cite{HalRied2012},~\cite{GeiRib2010},
MartinBot, AntiVandalBot~\cite{HalRied2012},
AWB, DumbBOT, EmausBot~\cite{GeiHal2013}.
Very crucial for the current analysis will be also Livingstone's observation in the preamble to his interview with the first large scale bot operator Ram-man that
``In the Wikimedia software, there are tasks that do all sorts of things [...].
If these things are not in the software, an external bot could do them. [...]
The main difference is where it runs and who runs it.''~\cite{Livingstone2016}
\begin{comment}
%ClueBot NG
"ClueBot\_NG uses state-of-the-art machine learning techniques to review all contributions to
......@@ -281,7 +289,9 @@ AWB, DumbBOT, EmausBot
"“HBC AIV helperbot7” – automatically
removed the third vandal fighter's now-obsolete report."
%Note on collaboration bots/edit filters. Maybe not the suitable chapter
bots and bespoke code!~\cite{Geiger2014}
\end{comment}
\subsection{ORES}
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment