Add notes on C's feedback

meeting-notes/20190613.md

@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
 ## Notes
 
 * focus on the 3 questions and the data we already have! *Don't* start anything new!
+* framing question: why does filter legacy system still exist in times of fancier machine learning tools?
 
 
 ## TODO

thesis/2-Background.tex

@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ There is one mechanism though that is very ostentatiously missing from all these
   \includegraphics[width=0.9\columnwidth]{pics/funnel-diagramm-no-filters.JPG}
   \caption{State of the scientific literature: edit filters are missing from the quality control frame}~\label{fig:funnel-no-filters}
 \end{figure}
+%TODO merge with rise and decline graphic from~\cite{HalGeiMorRied2013}
 
 At first, scientific studies on Wikipedia largely ignored algorithmic quality control mechanisms.
 Their contribution to the encyclopedia and therefore their impact were considered insignificant. %quote?

thesis/references.bib

@@ -116,6 +116,17 @@
   note =         {\url{https://github.com/lusy/wikifilters}}
 }
 
+@article{HalGeiMorRied2013,
+  title = {The rise and decline of an open collaboration system: How Wikipedia’s reaction to popularity is causing its decline},
+  author = {Halfaker, Aaron and Geiger, R Stuart and Morgan, Jonathan T and Riedl, John},
+  journal = {American Behavioral Scientist},
+  volume = {57},
+  number = {5},
+  pages = {664--688},
+  year = {2013},
+  publisher = {Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA}
+}
+
 @article{HalGeiMorSarWig2018,
   title = {ORES: Facilitating re-mediation of Wikipedia’s socio-technical problems},
   author = {Halfaker, Aaron and Geiger, R Stuart and Morgan, Jonathan T and Sarabadani, Amir and Wight, Adam},