Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
W
wikifilters
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Requirements
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Locked files
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Test cases
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Package Registry
Container Registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Terraform modules
Monitor
Incidents
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Code review analytics
Issue analytics
Insights
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
luvaseva
wikifilters
Commits
8b4f68fa
Commit
8b4f68fa
authored
5 years ago
by
Lyudmila Vaseva
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
[Defence] Continue slides
parent
79ecc190
No related branches found
Branches containing commit
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
defense/slides.md
+14
-2
14 additions, 2 deletions
defense/slides.md
with
14 additions
and
2 deletions
defense/slides.md
+
14
−
2
View file @
8b4f68fa
...
...
@@ -124,6 +124,8 @@ manner.
## Q1: What is the role of edit filters among existing algorithmic quality-control mechanisms on Wikipedia (bots, semi-automated tools, ORES, humans)?
Consider pasting the comparison table from chapter 4 here
*
1st mechanism activated to control quality (at the beginning of the funnel)
*
historically: faster, by being a direct part of the core software: disallow
even before publishing
...
...
@@ -132,7 +134,6 @@ manner.
*
introduced to take care of obvious but cumbersome to remove vandalism
*
people fed up with bot introduction and development processes (poor quality, no tests, no
code available for revision in case of problems) (so came up with a new approach)
*
filter allow more easily for collaboration
*
disallow certain types of obvious pervasive (perhaps automated) vandalism directly
*
takes more than a single click to revert
*
human editors can use their time more productively elsewhere
...
...
@@ -142,7 +143,7 @@ manner.
## Q2: Edit filters are a classical rule-based system. Why are they still active today when more sophisticated ML approaches exist?
*
introduced before vandalism fighting ML systems came along
(verify!)
; so they
*
introduced before
most
vandalism fighting ML systems came along; so they
were there first historically; still work well; don't touch a running system^^
*
a gap was perceived in the existing system which was filled with filters
* in functionality
:
disallow cumbersome vandalism from the start
...
...
@@ -154,11 +155,14 @@ manner.
*
and easier to work with (easier to add yet another rule than tweak paremeters
in an obscure ML based approach)
* allows for finer levels of control than ML
:
i.e. disallowing specific users
*
filter allow more easily for collaboration
---
## Q3: Which type of tasks do filters take over?
[add pics]
*
in total most filters are hidden: so implemented with the purpose of taking care of
cumbersome vandalism by specific malicious users
*
vandalism/good faith/maintenance
...
...
@@ -182,6 +186,8 @@ manner.
## Open Questions / Directions for future studies
maybe just an exceprt here?
-
MR is merged: abuse_filter_history table is now available
*
How have edit filters's tasks evolved over time? : should be easier to look
...
...
@@ -214,6 +220,12 @@ manner.
## Sum Up: Contributions?
*
initial systematic investigation of filters and their role among other mechanisms
*
codebook for classifying filters according to their task
*
openly accessible artefacts: scripts for data analysis, etc.
*
*abuse_filter_history*
table
*
questions for future research
---
## Current Limitations
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment