Really finish paper summary

literature/notes

@@ -1763,3 +1763,38 @@ rejected outright."
 dropped slightly, from a peak of 67% in 2005 to 56% in 2010. The overall rate of reciprocation
 has dropped dramatically, since none of the major bots are programmed to reciprocate BRD
 initiations." //reciprocation = answer to posts on their talk pages initiated by reverted editors
+
+"Figure 6 suggests that a large number of newcomers (2,250 BRD initializations from
+918 unique registered editors) are attempting to enter into dialog with an algorithmic editor after
+being reverted by them" //people not aware they are trying to talk to a bot?
+
+"ditors who
+revert using Huggle have an average response rate of 7%, compared to editors who use the
+browser-based extension Twinkle, which has an average response rate of 53% – only slightly
+lower than editors who revert manually."
+
+"2006 saw an even higher number of proposed policies, but lower acceptance
+with 24 out of 348 proposals accepted (7% acceptance). From 2007 forward, the rate at which
+policies are proposed decreases monotonically down to a mere 16 in 2011 while the acceptance
+rate stays steady at about 7.5%"
+
+"We find an increase in essay creation that corresponds to the decline in policy creation"
+"in 2006, 22% of new essays began as failed policy proposals.
+However, the percentage of essays that started out as rejected policies or guidelines decreases
+sharply to 12% in 2007 and 1% by 2011."
+
+"over time, contributions to all types are more
+likely to be rejected independent of the tenure of the editor making the contribution."
+
+"rules are less open to revision by affected editors than they were during the growth period"
+"increasing the power imbalance between newer and older editors."
+"essays are not official, enforceable rules and are not widely cited. While
+an increase in essay writing is an encouraging sign of newer editors’ continued interest in
+participating in community governance, it is not an effective mechanism for social change."
+"informal norms documented in essays are trumped by
+formal norms embedded in bots and human computation tools."
+
+"Wikipedia has changed from “the encyclopedia that anyone can edit” to “the encyclopedia that
+anyone who understands the norms, socializes him or herself, dodges the impersonal wall of
+semi-automated rejection and still wants to voluntarily contribute his or her time and energy can
+edit”"