^ where does this come from?? There should be a history table!
Do smth with this info:
Claudia: * A focus on the Good faith policies/guidelines is a historical development. After the huge surge in edits Wikipedia experienced starting 2005 the community needed a means to handle these (and the proportional amount of vandalism). They opted for automatisation. Automated system branded a lot of good faith edits as vandalism, which drove new comers away. A policy focus on good faith is part of the intentions to fix this.
* We need a description of the technical workings of the edit filter system!
...
...
@@ -11,7 +8,6 @@ Claudia: * A focus on the Good faith policies/guidelines is a historical develop
* Why are there mechanisms triggered befor an edit gets published (such as edit filters), and such triggered afterwards (such as bots)? Is there a qualitative difference?
* I want to help people to do their work better using a technical system (e.g. the edit filters). How can I do this?
* The edit filter system can be embedded in the vandalism prevention frame. Are there other contexts/frames for which it is relevant?
* really get hold of the abuse_filter_log table! Ask Hong/Marisa.
* Think about: what's the computer science take on the field? How can we design a "better"/more efficient/more user friendly system? A system that reflects particular values (vgl Code 2.0, Chapter 3, p.34)?
* go over notes in the filter classification and think about interesting controversies, things that attract the attention
