681 36 1 0 0 1 0 default 20090830005032 warn,disallow 10 SEO push University of Atlanta
680 290 0 0 0 1 0 default 20100312022427 10 172 Filter politically_motivated not quite sure what the issue is, but ‘political party’, ‘canada’ and ‘trudeau’ (current prime minister of canada) which are the patterns looked for signal politically motivated vandalism
681 36 1 0 0 1 0 default 20090830005032 warn,disallow 10 SEO push University of Atlanta conflict_of_interest or ‘seo’ (which I haven’t used during the second labeling sofar)
684 343 0 0 0 1 0 default 20100920023444 10 Keemstar vandalism general_vandalism not quite sure what the issue is, but ‘vandalism’ appears in the name of the filter, hence the label; this seems to be an internet celebrity;
685 603 1 0 0 0 0 default 20160405110310 warn 10 Special case of reverting XLinkBot reverts hidden_vandalism
716 208 0 0 0 1 0 default 20090830005614 7 Removal of WebCite URLs unclear I’m not quite certain why is this an issue
717 245 1 0 0 1 0 default 20110310110845 disallow 7 AN and AN/I abuse hidden_vandalism AN=Administrator’s noticeboard
718 275 1 0 0 1 0 default 20100329231511 6 New users moving featured articles hidden_vandalism
719 38 1 0 0 1 0 default 20090807112247 warn,disallow 6 Argentina nuclear energy IP hopper hidden_vandalism
720 57 0 0 0 1 0 default 20090327103250 6 Creation of attack page titles doxxing as per comments; the title doesn’t quite fit the patterns and discussion, imho
721 70 1 0 0 1 0 default 20090321081152 6 Unusual move reason hidden_vandalism or ‘page_move_vandalism’ as per title
722 347 1 0 0 1 0 default 20190105155520 warn,disallow 6 Yet another test filter test
727 418 1 0 0 1 0 default 20170402073605 disallow 6 User is Shirik (test filter) test
728 421 0 0 0 1 0 default 20120808231722 6 Engvar filter good_faith not quite sure what “changes between accepted styles by new users” are (see comments), but hey
@@ -470,10 +470,10 @@ Multiple filters have the comment "let's see whether this hits something", which
\section{Patterns in filters creation and usage}
* What are typical filter usage patterns?
** switched on for a while, then deactivated and never activated again?: 81 (bad charts), 167 (two brief disables underway), 302 (switched off on the grounds of insufficient activity); 904 (to track smth)
** switched on for a short while and then powered down: mostly stuff merged to other filters; or for which the community decides filter is not an appropriate solution (308), 199 ('Unflagged Bots'); or decides to not implement the thing (that way); 290 (disabled, since relevant pages were protected)
** or switched off after a short while because there were no hits: 304, 67, 122
** or switched off after a longer while, because it was not tripped frequently, in order to save conditions from the condition limit: 211 ("Disable, appears to be inactive (log only filter). If you are using this filter, please let me know, and I'll reenable it -Prodego")
** switched on for a while, then deactivated and never activated again?: 81 (bad charts), 167 (two brief disables underway), 302 (switched off on the grounds of insufficient activity); 904 (to track smth);
** switched on for a short while and then powered down: mostly stuff merged to other filters; or for which the community decides filter is not an appropriate solution (308), 199 ('Unflagged Bots'); or decides to not implement the thing (that way); 290 (disabled, since relevant pages were protected); 207 ("Copy of another one we disabled. Unneeded, a bot already sees this. -Prodego")
** or switched off after a short while because there were no hits: 304, 67, 122, 401 ("Red hair" vandalism)
** or switched off after a longer while, because it was not tripped frequently, in order to save conditions from the condition limit: 211 ("Disable, appears to be inactive (log only filter). If you are using this filter, please let me know, and I'll reenable it -Prodego"); 20 ("A waste of processor time, deleted -Prodego")
** switched off bc merged to another filter 440 was merged in 345
** on for a short while and off again bc?? (false positives is a plausible option here): 394
** switched on and still on: 11 (verify), 79 (with brief periods of being disabled for couple of minutes/hours, probably in order to update the pattern), 164, 642 (if we ignore the 2min period it was disabled on 13.4.2018), 733 (2.11.2015-present), 29 (18.3.2009-present), 30 (18.3.2009-present), 33 (18.3.2009-present), 39 (18.3.2009-present), 50 (18.3.2009-present), 59 (19.3.2009-present), 80 (22.3.2009-present)
...
...
@@ -484,7 +484,7 @@ Multiple filters have the comment "let's see whether this hits something", which
* What do filters target: general behaviour vs edits by single users
** there are quite some filters targeting particular users: 290 (targets an IP range), 177 ('User:Television Radio'), 663 ('Techno genre warrior
', targets specific IP ranges)
** there are also some targetting particular pages (verify!), although this clashed with the guidelines: 264 "Specific-page vandalism" (it's hidden though, so we don't know what exactly it's doing)
** there are also some targetting particular pages (verify!), although this clashed with the guidelines: 264 "Specific-page vandalism" (it's hidden though, so we don't know what exactly it's doing); 401 ("Red hair" vandalism); there's smth with the main page;
** and there are some filtering in general
** there are also filters such as 199 (Unflagged bots) which were implemented in order to track something which was not quite malicious or abusive and were thus deemed inappropriate use of filters by the community and consequently (quite swiftly) deleted
** some target insults in general and some contain regexes containing very specifically insults directed towards edit filter managers (see filter 12)
