Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit b05115f5 authored by Lyudmila Vaseva's avatar Lyudmila Vaseva
Browse files

What were the first (most urgent?) filters to be introduced

parent 74ea53fe
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -118,7 +118,6 @@ Most public filters on the other hand still assume good faith from the editors a
\caption{EN Wikipedia edit filters: Filters actions for enabled hidden filters}~\label{fig:active-hidden-actions}
\end{figure}
%TODO What were the first filters to be implemented immediately after the launch of the extension?
\subsection{Filter makers}
......@@ -369,6 +368,16 @@ In the subsections that follow we discuss the salient properties of each manuall
\item percentage filters of different types over the years: according to actions (I need a complete abuse\_filter\_log table for this!); according to self-assigned tags %TODO plot!
\end{comment}
%TODO What were the first filters to be implemented immediately after the launch of the extension?
The extension was launched on March 17th, 2009.
Filter 1 is implemented in the late hours of that day.
Filters with IDs 1-80 (IDs are auto-incremented) were implemented the first 5 days after the extension was turned on (17-22.03.2009).
So, apparently the most urgent problems the initial edit filter managers perceived were:
page move vandalism (what Filter 1 initially targeted; it was later converted to a general test filter);
blanking articles (filter 3)
personal attacks (filter 9,11) and obscenities (12)
some concrete users/cases (hidden filters, e.g. 4,21) and sockpuppetry (16,17)
Following filter categories have been identified (sometimes, a filter was labeled with more than one tag):
%TODO make a diagramm with these
- Vandalism
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment