Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
W
wikifilters
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Requirements
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Locked files
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Test cases
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Package registry
Container registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Terraform modules
Monitor
Incidents
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Code review analytics
Issue analytics
Insights
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
luvaseva
wikifilters
Commits
c6b36362
Commit
c6b36362
authored
6 years ago
by
Lyudmila Vaseva
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
Move bot papers notes to literature notes
parent
c7d3a922
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Changes
2
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
2 changed files
literature/notes
+28
-1
28 additions, 1 deletion
literature/notes
notes
+0
-29
0 additions, 29 deletions
notes
with
28 additions
and
30 deletions
literature/notes
+
28
−
1
View file @
c6b36362
\cite{MuellerBirn2014}
Interesting info, not sure what to do with it
2010: 40% of newcommers' contributions rejected based on automatic tools <---
counter productive in engaging new contributors
=====================================================
\cite{GeiHal2017}
Claudia's paper:
"“In both cases of algorithmic governance
– software features and bots – making rules part of the infrastructure, to a certain extent, makes
them harder to change and easier to enforce” (p. 87)"
=====================================================
\cite{MueDoHer2013}
1st major difference EN/DE Wikipedia:
- automated vandal fighting not permitted in DE Wikipedia (ist es immer noch
so?)
"algorithmic tools are only intended to support editors in identify-
ing possible malicious edits, but automated assessments are not
accepted"
"Fighting vandals is seen as a form of handling excep-
tions and should therefore be based upon human evaluation."
Hoe? DE Wikipedia has also edit filters which is an automatic assessment of what to disallow.
\cite{WulThaDix2017}
\cite{WulThaDix2017}
personal attacks
personal attacks
...
@@ -7,7 +34,7 @@ looked at comments on Wikipedia talk pages
...
@@ -7,7 +34,7 @@ looked at comments on Wikipedia talk pages
100k human labeled comments
100k human labeled comments
63k machine labeled (classifier)
63k machine labeled (classifier)
generated data set:
generated data set:
https://figshare.com/
a
rticles/Wikipedia_Detox_Data/4054689
https://figshare.com/
G
rticles/Wikipedia_Detox_Data/4054689
analysed time period: 2004-2015
analysed time period: 2004-2015
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
notes
+
0
−
29
View file @
c6b36362
...
@@ -1242,32 +1242,3 @@ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Responding_to_threats_of_harm
...
@@ -1242,32 +1242,3 @@ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Responding_to_threats_of_harm
emergency response page
emergency response page
=====================================================
\cite{MuellerBirn2014}
Interesting info, not sure what to do with it
2010: 40% of newcommers' contributions rejected based on automatic tools <---
counter productive in engaging new contributors
=====================================================
\cite{GeiHal2017}
Claudia's paper:
"“In both cases of algorithmic governance
– software features and bots – making rules part of the infrastructure, to a certain extent, makes
them harder to change and easier to enforce” (p. 87)"
=====================================================
\cite{MueDoHer2013}
1st major difference EN/DE Wikipedia:
- automated vandal fighting not permitted in DE Wikipedia (ist es immer noch
so?)
"algorithmic tools are only intended to support editors in identify-
ing possible malicious edits, but automated assessments are not
accepted"
"Fighting vandals is seen as a form of handling excep-
tions and should therefore be based upon human evaluation."
Hoe? DE Wikipedia has also edit filters which is an automatic assessment of what to disallow.
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment