Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 269dde2a authored by Lyudmila Vaseva's avatar Lyudmila Vaseva
Browse files

Add a couple of notes

parent 0afb1245
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
# Meeting 15.07.2019
* Evaluation?
* Abstract in DE and EN?
* Discuss clusters (manual tagging)
* Bots on Wikipedia: Unfolding their duties -> technical report?
* methods chapter vs explaining methodology in chapters?
* split chapter 5: manual classification in a separate chapter?
......@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ what is in someone' s mind-particularly if he or she does not tell you."(p.68)
\end{comment}
\section{Cooking Data With Care}
or Critical data science? Or both?
%\section{Cooking Data With Care}
%or Critical data science? Or both?
\section{Validation}
......@@ -12,11 +12,11 @@
\section{Code book}
\label{app:code_book}
The purpose of this section is to provide a detailed overview of the labels\footnote{Here, I use the words "codes"/"tags"/"labels" interchangeably.} used for the manual tagging of edit filters.
Here, a detailed overview of the labels\footnote{Here, I use the words "codes"/"tags"/"labels" interchangeably.} used for the manual tagging of edit filters is provided.
\subsection{A few notes on the labels/labeling process}
I started coding strongly influenced by the coding methodologies applied by Grounded Theory scholars~\cite[42-71]{Charmaz2006} and mostly let the labels emerge during the process. %TODO describe in greater detail? should appear in methodology anyway?
I started coding strongly influenced by the coding methodologies applied by grounded theory scholars~\cite[42-71]{Charmaz2006} (described in more detail in chapter~\ref{chap:methods}) and mostly let the labels emerge during the process.
In addition to that, for vandalism related labels, I used some of the vandalism types identified by the community in~\cite{Wikipedia:VandalismTypes}.
However, I regarded the types more as an inspiration and haven't adopted the proposed typology 1:1 since I found some of the identified types quite general and more specific categories seemed to render more insights.
For instance, I haven't adopted the 'addition of text' category since it seemed more insightful(syn!) to have more specific labels such as 'hoaxing' or 'silly\_vandalism', see below for definition.
......
......@@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ In a way, not taking a side is positioning in itself.
The present thesis just lay the ground work for future edit filters research.
I gave an initial overview and summarised/showed/pointed out interesting paths/framework for future research (syn!).
% TODO Refer back to title! Who is allowed to publish? Who decides?
Special attention: following edit filters from DE Wikipedia:
196 : "US-amerikanisch -> amerikanisch ([[WP:RS\#Korrektoren]])"
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment