Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 269dde2a authored by Lyudmila Vaseva's avatar Lyudmila Vaseva
Browse files

Add a couple of notes

parent 0afb1245
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
# Meeting 15.07.2019
* Evaluation?
* Abstract in DE and EN?
* Discuss clusters (manual tagging)
* Bots on Wikipedia: Unfolding their duties -> technical report?
* methods chapter vs explaining methodology in chapters?
* split chapter 5: manual classification in a separate chapter?
...@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ what is in someone' s mind-particularly if he or she does not tell you."(p.68) ...@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ what is in someone' s mind-particularly if he or she does not tell you."(p.68)
\end{comment} \end{comment}
\section{Cooking Data With Care} %\section{Cooking Data With Care}
or Critical data science? Or both? %or Critical data science? Or both?
\section{Validation} \section{Validation}
...@@ -12,11 +12,11 @@ ...@@ -12,11 +12,11 @@
\section{Code book} \section{Code book}
\label{app:code_book} \label{app:code_book}
The purpose of this section is to provide a detailed overview of the labels\footnote{Here, I use the words "codes"/"tags"/"labels" interchangeably.} used for the manual tagging of edit filters. Here, a detailed overview of the labels\footnote{Here, I use the words "codes"/"tags"/"labels" interchangeably.} used for the manual tagging of edit filters is provided.
\subsection{A few notes on the labels/labeling process} \subsection{A few notes on the labels/labeling process}
I started coding strongly influenced by the coding methodologies applied by Grounded Theory scholars~\cite[42-71]{Charmaz2006} and mostly let the labels emerge during the process. %TODO describe in greater detail? should appear in methodology anyway? I started coding strongly influenced by the coding methodologies applied by grounded theory scholars~\cite[42-71]{Charmaz2006} (described in more detail in chapter~\ref{chap:methods}) and mostly let the labels emerge during the process.
In addition to that, for vandalism related labels, I used some of the vandalism types identified by the community in~\cite{Wikipedia:VandalismTypes}. In addition to that, for vandalism related labels, I used some of the vandalism types identified by the community in~\cite{Wikipedia:VandalismTypes}.
However, I regarded the types more as an inspiration and haven't adopted the proposed typology 1:1 since I found some of the identified types quite general and more specific categories seemed to render more insights. However, I regarded the types more as an inspiration and haven't adopted the proposed typology 1:1 since I found some of the identified types quite general and more specific categories seemed to render more insights.
For instance, I haven't adopted the 'addition of text' category since it seemed more insightful(syn!) to have more specific labels such as 'hoaxing' or 'silly\_vandalism', see below for definition. For instance, I haven't adopted the 'addition of text' category since it seemed more insightful(syn!) to have more specific labels such as 'hoaxing' or 'silly\_vandalism', see below for definition.
......
...@@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ In a way, not taking a side is positioning in itself. ...@@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ In a way, not taking a side is positioning in itself.
The present thesis just lay the ground work for future edit filters research. The present thesis just lay the ground work for future edit filters research.
I gave an initial overview and summarised/showed/pointed out interesting paths/framework for future research (syn!). I gave an initial overview and summarised/showed/pointed out interesting paths/framework for future research (syn!).
% TODO Refer back to title! Who is allowed to publish? Who decides?
Special attention: following edit filters from DE Wikipedia: Special attention: following edit filters from DE Wikipedia:
196 : "US-amerikanisch -> amerikanisch ([[WP:RS\#Korrektoren]])" 196 : "US-amerikanisch -> amerikanisch ([[WP:RS\#Korrektoren]])"
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment